
10 Apr Tottenham vs. Man Metropolis: ‘Recreation’s gone!’ – VAR slated once more after controversial Rose handball
The away facet have been awarded a spot-kick after a video evaluation in Tuesday’s Champions League quarter-final first leg
The checklist of VAR controversies is at all times rising, and it received one other entry in Tuesday’s Champions League match between Tottenham and Manchester Metropolis.
The quarter-final first leg was scoreless within the 12th minute when Danny Rose blocked Raheem Sterling’s shot on objective.
With the ball hanging Rose’s barely raised arm, referee Bjorn Kuipers went to the monitor to take a re-examination and finally awarded a penalty to Metropolis.
The choice was extremely controversial, as Rose appeared to have his arm near his physique, however Hugo Lloris would then guarantee his facet wouldn’t go all the way down to an early deficit.
Article continues beneath
The Spurs goalkeeper blocked Sergio Aguero’s subsequent penalty, guaranteeing the match continued scoreless.
Regardless of the save, there have been nonetheless loads of complaints about what seemed to be a harsh name.
Chants of “VAR, VAR” going to be heard incessantly all through matches now, followers calling for motion at perceived incident. Already heard loudly right here.
— Henry Winter (@henrywinter) April 9, 2019
Actually not bought on the way in which VAR is being carried out. Use of know-how is an effective factor however there’s one thing actually jarring a few system which supplies a choice like that penalty looking back – one barely anybody within the floor noticed or many (if any) gamers really appealed for.
— James Olley (@JamesOlley) April 9, 2019
We have now one of the best referee on the planet out right here. He didn’t see a penalty…
VAR did. Some guys in a monitor swimsuit in a bus outdoors the stadium accountable for VAR noticed itSimply saying
— Jan Aage Fjortoft (@JanAageFjortoft) April 9, 2019
VAR was speculated to make this simpler but we’re extra divided and at odds than ever earlier than over what’s and isn’t an infringement/penalty/no matter
— My Son Consciousness Month (@JamesTylerESPN) April 9, 2019
There are going to be A LOT of VAR penalties for handball from now on.
— Liam Twomey (@liam_twomey) April 9, 2019
VAR goes to PISS everyone off subsequent season and I can’t wait
— YouTube: Shirtless Plantain Present (@Nigerianscamsss) April 9, 2019
One more instance of how horribly inconsistent VAR is. Saturday, equivalent incident with Alex Sandro in opposition to Milan wasn’t given. In the present day penalty is given vs Danny Rose. Whether or not it needs to be a penalty is irrelevant, the inconsistency with VAR is dreadful this season #TOTMCI
— Carlo Garganese (@carlogarganese) April 9, 2019
That is shambolic use of #VAR.
— Aly Wagner (@alywagner) April 9, 2019
Not what VAR needs to be used for. By no means a transparent and apparent error. Justice executed… in my view,
— Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) April 9, 2019
This isn’t what VAR was bought as, even to those that have been strongly on board. This isn’t eradicating severe refereeing errors or decreasing controversy. It is merely shifting it from on-pitch to off-pitch.
— Daniel Storey (@danielstorey85) April 9, 2019
Video games gone, by no means to be the identical #VAR #TOTMCI
— Glenn Murray (@GM_83) April 9, 2019
No Comments